Philosophy, rhetoric and argumentation
Read Online
Share

Philosophy, rhetoric and argumentation by Maurice Natanson

  • 675 Want to read
  • ·
  • 28 Currently reading

Published by Pennsylvania State U.P .
Written in English


Book details:

Edition Notes

Statementedited by Maurice Natanson and Henry W. Johnstone ; foreword by Robert T. Oliver.
ContributionsJohnstone, Henry W.
The Physical Object
Pagination176p.
Number of Pages176
ID Numbers
Open LibraryOL13692966M

Download Philosophy, rhetoric and argumentation

PDF EPUB FB2 MOBI RTF

Forward: Philosophy, rhetoric, and argumentation: congenial or conjunctive? / Robert T. Oliver --Introduction: Some reflections on argumentation / Henry W. Johnstone, Jr. --The claims of immediacy / Maurice Natanson Description: For over 40 years, Philosophy and Rhetoric has published some of the most influential articles on relations between philosophy and rhetoric. Topics include the connections between logic and rhetoric, the philosophical aspects of argumentation (including argumentation in philosophy itself), philosophical views on the nature of rhetoric among historical figures and during historical periods, philosophical analyses of the relation to rhetoric . COVID Resources. Reliable information about the coronavirus (COVID) is available from the World Health Organization (current situation, international travel).Numerous and frequently-updated resource results are available from this ’s WebJunction has pulled together information and resources to assist library staff as they consider how to handle coronavirus. Christopher W. Tindale (PhD and MA, University of Waterloo; BA, Wilfrid Laurier University) teaches and conducts research in the areas of argumentation theory, ethics, and ancient philosophy. Since , he's been an editor of the journal Informal Logic: Reasoning and Argumentation in Theory and Practice, and he presently sits on the editorial board of Controversia.

Rhetorical Argumentation is designed to provide advanced undergraduate and graduate students with a clear understanding of the rhetorical view of argumentation and how it can be effective in contemporary society. The book is an ideal text for courses in Communication, Rhetoric, Argumentation, Informal Logic, Critical Thinking, and Conflict Resolution. Philosophy and Rhetoric invites articles on such topics as the relationship between logic and rhetoric, the philosophical aspects of argumentation (including argumentation in philosophy itself), philosophical views on the nature of rhetoric held by historical figures and during historical periods, psychological and sociological studies of rhetoric with a strong philosophical emphasis, and philosophical analyses of the relationship to rhetoric . Argumentation is an international and interdisciplinary journal that gathers academic contributions from a wide range of scholarly backgrounds and approaches to reasoning, natural inference and persuasion: communication, classical and modern rhetoric, linguistics, discourse analysis, pragmatics, psychology, philosophy, formal and informal logic, critical thinking, history and law. Philosophy & Rhetoric invites articles on such topics as the relationship between logic and rhetoric, the philosophical aspects of argumentation (including argumentation in philosophy itself), philosophical views on the nature of rhetoric held by historical figures and during historical periods, philosophical analyses of the relationship to rhetoric of other areas of human culture and thought, political theory and law, and psychological and sociological studies of rhetoric .

  To Plato, the Sophists, as well as rhetoric in general, was something of a disease that infected the minds of citizens and distracted them from the noble pursuits of philosophy. Aristotle, on the other hand, was a bit more realistic about the state of human nature.   7 Good Books on Rhetoric and Writing Well Here are some books that I can recommend on the art of rhetoric and argumentation, and by extension, the craft of writing well: 1. “Rhetoric” by Aristotle is the classic source of course. Must read. It’s s. Types of Argumentation. Three common types of argumentation are classical A type of argument that relies on the presentation of a thesis, use of rhetorical appeals, and refutation of opposing views., Toulminian Based on the work of Stephen Toulmin, a type of argument concerned with the establishment of claims, backed by warrants and supported with evidence., and Rogerian Based on the work of. Philosophy and Rhetoric invites articles on such topics as the relationship between logic and rhetoric, the philosophical aspects of argumentation (including argumentation in philosophy itself), philosophical views on the nature of rhetoric held by historical figures and during historical periods, psychological and sociological studies of.